COLONIAL RIVALRY IN AFRICA
The development of capitalism in Europe led to the development of the industrial revolution which started in Britain in 1750 and by the end of the18th century Britain was the only industrialized nation in the world.However in the 19th century, other European countries such as France, Belgium, Germany and Italy also industrialized.
The industrialization of almost all European countries meant that there was no area to expand within European hence there was the need to find colonies. From 1870 monopoly capitalism demanded for the following:-
-
Markets
-
Raw materials
-
Cheap labor
-
Investment areas
-
Areas to resettle surplus labor force.
edu.uptymez.com
Therefore the demands made capitalism to change to its monopolistic stage called imperialism. Colonialism was therefore linked with the development of capitalism in Europe, in the sense that it was undertaken to meet the demands of capitalism.
THE SCRAMBLE FOR AND PARTITION OF AFRICA
The scramble for Africa refers to the way European powers struggled among themselves to acquire colonies in Africa while the partition of Africa refers to the different steps taken by the European powers to divide Africa into territories and fixing colonial boundaries.
The major European powers that were involved in this exercise were Britain, Germany, France, Portugal and Belgium.
By 1880‟s it was only Africa which was not colonized therefore it became the centre of imperialist attention which was driven by the development of capitalism.
FACTORS THAT DETERMINED THE CONFIGURATION OR THE PATTERN OF
THE SCRAMBLE FOR AND PARTITION OF AFRICA
During the scramble and partition of Africa; there were some areas that witnessed serious conflicts among the imperialist powers for example the Congo Niger basin. There were various factors that determined the pattern of the scramble for and partition of Africa.
-
Accessibility into the interior of Africa.
edu.uptymez.com
The imperialist powers scrambled for those areas that offered means of transport into the interior of Africa. These powers were interested in the interior because they wanted raw materials and markets where they can sell their manufactured goods. This explains why the Congo River was competed from the Belgium, France, and Portugal and the Niger River were competed for by France, Britain and Germany.
-
Strategic factors.
edu.uptymez.com
This is one of the factors that determined the pattern of the scramble and the partition of Africa. Britain controlled Egypt because of the Suez Canal which was used to transport raw materials and manufactured goods into and outside Africa.
Britain also controlled Uganda because it wanted to protect the source of river Nile which is found in Uganda.
-
Agricultural potentialities.
edu.uptymez.com
The imperial powers struggled for areas that had fertile soils that could support the growth of cash crops. Various powers struggled for the Congo and Niger rivers because the areas around the rivers were very fertile and therefore suitable for cash crop production.
-
Mineral potentialities.
edu.uptymez.com
The imperials powers struggled for areas that had minerals in large quantities. Colonies such as Zimbabwe was very vital because it had large amounts of gold and diamond. Many imperialist powers were also interested in the Congo (DRC) because of the existence of large quantities of copper.
-
Population
edu.uptymez.com
Population was one of the major factors that determined the nature of the scramble and partition of Africa. The colonial powers struggled for those areas with high population because they ensured constant supply of cheap labor and ready markets for the European manufactured goods.
ESTABLISHMENT OF COLONIAL RULE OF AFRICA
The partition of Africa marked the end of Africa‟s political independence and the beginning of subjection to foreign rule. In the event of establishing colonial rule, the European powers used different methods depending on nature and attitude of the nature population.
Sometimes the methods depended on the prevailing circumstances on the ground such as geographical location of the colony.
The tactics that were used to establish colonial rule include the following:-
-
Treaty signing
-
Use of military force
-
Alliances
-
Gun butt diplomacy
-
Mercenary technique
-
Berlin conference
edu.uptymez.com
-
Treaty signing.
edu.uptymez.com
This was one of the most common techniques that were used to establish colonial rule in Africa. The European powers urged African leaders to sign treaties with the European claiming to give protection against their local and foreign enemies. Karl Peters signed treaties African chiefs in Tanganyika which put Tanganyika under German control.
Moffat an Anglican Missionary ennglish-swahili/courage” target=”_blank”>couraged Lobengula.
-
Use of Military force.
edu.uptymez.com
Sometimes direct military confrontation was used to establish colonial rule in Africa. The military was used in areas that resisted the establishment of colonial rule. The British used military force against the Nandi in Kenya and the Germans used force against the Hehe and Abushiri in Tanganyika.
The colonial powers used force because they were determined to establish their rule in Africa so as to exploit African resources.
-
Alliances.
edu.uptymez.com
This method was used in areas were two societies were in conflict, that is situation of enmity. The colonial powers allied with one society against the other one and then controlled all of them together. In Tanganyika the German sided with Sango and Bena against Hehe and in central Africa, the British allied with chief Lewanika of lozi Kingdom against lobengula of the Ndebele people in Zimbabwe.
This led to the defect of Lobengula and the final colonization of Zimbabwe by the British
-
Gun butt diplomacy.
edu.uptymez.com
This was the tactique where the colonial powers had threatened to use force but they did not actually use force. This method aimed at forcing African into submission. This method was used by British against King Jaja of Opobo in West Africa.
-
Mercenary Technique.
edu.uptymez.com
In this policy, colonial powers used Africans to establish their rule in Africa. Here they used people who had no blood ties with the people who are being invaded for example the Germans used the Rugaruga in Tanganyika.
-
Berlin Conference.
edu.uptymez.com
This was one of the methods used to establish colonial rule in Africa. This conference legalized the scramble for and partition of Africa. It laid down the principles that were to be followed when controlling Africa. One of the principles was effective occupation of African territories.
THE COLONIAL STATE
The colonial state refers to the extension of the metropolitan state in the colony. The colonial state was established immediately after scramble for and partition of Africa. It was followed by the establishment of the colonial economy.
The colonial state was an instrument of the colonialists and not the African masses. It was responsible for the exploitation and oppression of the colonies.
Objectives of the colonial state:-
-
The colonial state was supposed to provide a link between the colonies and the metropolitan state. It had to ensure that the demands of the capitalists are satisfied such as the acquisition of raw materials and markets.
-
The colonial state was supposed to enforce laws and orders in the colony. These laws were supposed to ensure that the interests of the capitalists are protected.Laws concerning land alienation and taxation were meant to ensure the exploitation of African resources.
-
The colonial state was supposed to suppress or control African resistance against colonial. The suppression of African resistance aimed at ensuring that there is a good atmosphere for the exploitation of African resources. This explains why resistances such as Maji maji in Tanganyika and Nandi in Kenya had to be defeated at any cost.
-
The colonial state was supposed to construct physical infrastructure such as roads and railways. These establishments could not be established by individual capitalists thus it was the duty of the colonial state to establish them. The roads and railways facilitated the colonial economy by transporting raw materials and manufactured goods.
-
The colonial state was supposed to supervise colonial production in the colonies. The Africans in the colonies were supposed to produce cash crops and minerals that were needed in the metropolitan capitalist countries. Primarily the colonial economy was supposed to respond to the demands of the metropolitan economies.
-
The colonial state was supposed to provide security and protection to the white settlers. The colonial state established the judiciary, prisons and the police. The colonial state was imposed on the Africans thus it received state was imposed on the Africans thus it received resistance from the Africans, thus the colonial state had to ensure the safety of the Africans.
edu.uptymez.com
SIGNIFICANCE OF AGRICULTURE IN THE COLONIAL ECONOMY
Significance of agriculture in colonial economy within African colonies may be seen from the advantages which colonialists got after the establishment of agriculture and to less extent Africans also benefited.
-
Agriculture led colonialists to get raw materials such as (cotton, tea, sisal, Pyrethrum, cocoa.etc)that were needed in their capitalists industries for more development.
-
Expansion of market for European manufactured goods such as Agricultural tools.
-
It destroyed African technology in order to avoid competition with African technology.
-
Facilitated exploitation of African resources for the benefit of European capitalist, resources being both human and natural resources.
edu.uptymez.com
5.Agriculture boosted the development of industries in Europe because industries operated nicely because of enough availability of raw materials.
6.
Agriculture led to the construction of social services infrastructure like schools which prepared African elites such Mwl. Julius Kambarage Nyerere, Jomo Kenyatta and hospitals.Other physical infrastructures like roads and railways were contracted for transporting raw material from productive areas to the coast to full fill the interests of capitalists.